Artificial Intelligence, Academic Ethics, and the Transformation of Learning in Higher Education (Kecerdasan Artifisial, Etika Akademik, dan Transformasi Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i4.68Keywords:
Kecerdasan Artifisial, etika akademik, berpikir kritis, AI, Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
Perkembangan kecerdasan artifisial (AI) generatif telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam praktik penulisan akademik di pendidikan tinggi. Meskipun sering dipromosikan sebagai solusi efisiensi, penggunaan AI oleh mahasiswa memunculkan persoalan pedagogis, etis, dan epistemik yang serius. Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji secara kritis implikasi ketergantungan mahasiswa terhadap AI dalam penulisan akademik, dengan menempatkan menulis sebagai proses pembentukan berpikir kritis, kejujuran intelektual, dan relasi pedagogis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi literatur terhadap karya ilmiah, laporan media akademik, dan tulisan teoretis di bidang pedagogi kritis, psikologi pendidikan, dan etika akademik. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan AI berpotensi menimbulkan ilusi kompetensi akademik, menggeser orientasi belajar dari proses ke hasil, melemahkan integritas akademik, serta mengikis dimensi kemanusiaan dalam relasi dosen–mahasiswa. Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa persoalan AI dalam penulisan akademik bukan semata isu teknologi, melainkan tantangan filosofis dan pedagogis terkait makna belajar dan tujuan pendidikan tinggi. Integrasi AI perlu diarahkan untuk mendukung, bukan menggantikan, proses berpikir dan pembelajaran manusia.
References
Aalai, A. (2025). What is lost when students turn to AI. Psychology Today.
Abbas, F. M., & Sapari, S. (2025). Integrating Islamic Counseling and Guidance (BK Islami) Curriculum into Madrasah Aliyah Management System: Problem or Solution?. Lentera Peradaban: Journal on Islamic Studies, 1(3), 115-122.
Baehr, J. (2011). The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. Scribner.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/356095
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books.
Hasan, M. I. (2008). Pokok-pokok metodologi penelitian dan aplikasinya. Ghalia Indonesia.
Hoover, A. (2024, April 9). Students are likely writing millions of papers with A.I. Wired. https://www.wired.com
Hoover, J. (2024). The problem of hallucinations in large language models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.15240
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26.
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
Metz, C., & Weise, K. (2025, May 9). A.I. is more powerful, but its hallucinations are getting worse. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Murray, B. (2002). Writing to heal. Monitor on Psychology, 33(6), 54.
Murray, D. M. (2002). The craft of revision. Thomson/Heinle.
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?. Polity Press.
Yusuf, I. A., & Abbas, F. M. (2025). Inovasi kurikulum pendidikan Islam di perguruan tinggi: Integrasi tauhid, sains, dan teknologi. HASBUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7 (2), 142–152.
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Sage.
