Analysis of the Fundamental Concepts of Educational Psychology from the Perspective of Behaviorism, Cognitivism, and Constructivism Learning Theories

Authors

  • Fauziyah Universitas Darul Ma'arif Indramayu
  • Sri Ani Universitas Darul Ma’arif, Indramayu
  • Rifqi Universitas Darul Ma’arif, Indramayu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i3.14

Keywords:

psikologi pendidikan, behaviorisme, kognitivisme, konstruktivisme, teori belajar.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the foundational concepts of educational psychology through the lens of Behaviorism, Cognitivism, and Constructivism learning theories. The research employs a library research method, collecting and analyzing relevant literature from various sources. This theory focuses on observable behavior resulting from environmental stimulus and response. Key figures include Skinner, Watson, and Thorndike. Learning, in this view, happens through repetition, reinforcement (positive/negative), and consequences. The primary criticism of behaviorism is its limited attention to internal mental processes, often depicting learners as passive recipients. This approach emphasizes internal mental processes such as thinking and understanding. Theorists like Piaget, Bruner, Ausubel, and Gagne propose that learning involves changes in mental structures. It's crucial for educators to align teaching methods with students' developmental stages and foster deep understanding (insight). This theory suggests that students construct their own knowledge through direct experience and social interaction. Vygotsky is a prominent figure, known for concepts like the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and Scaffolding, which highlight the importance of guidance and collaboration in learning.

 

In essence, Behaviorism centers on external responses, Cognitivism on thought processing, and Constructivism on actively building knowledge through interaction. Understanding these three theories helps teachers create effective learning experiences. This research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the theoretical foundations of educational psychology and their implications for teaching practices.

References

Abimanyu, S. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran 3 SKS. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Bandura, A. 1997. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Bruner, J. S. 1977. The Process of Education. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.

Corno, L., dan Mandinach, E. 1983. The Role Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, (18): 188-208.

Gagne, R. M., dan Briggs, L. J. 1979. Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hidayah, N., dan Triyono. 2005. Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang.

Hidayah, N. 2013a. Cybercounseling Kognitif Behavioral di Malang Raya Jawa Timur. Proceding Seminar Internasional ABKIN, Denpasar Bali, 14 s.d. 16 November.

__________. 2013b. Online Cognitive Behavioral Counseling Model to Improve Junior Higher School Student’s Self Regulated Learning. Proceding of International Conferences on Careers in New ERA, UNIPA, Surabaya.

Iversen, I. H. 1978. Clasical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning: A Response Pattern Analysis. New York: Springer.

Koffka, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Lund Humphries.

Kohler, W. 1968. The Task of Gestalt Psychology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experiences as the Source of

Learning an Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prantice Hall, Inc.

Lewin, K. 1942. Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGrawHill Book Company, Inc.

Premack, D. 1965. Two Sides of a Generalization, or Catching up with Commonsense: Reinforcement and Punishment. Dalam Glaser, R., (Eds.)., The Nature of Reinforcement. New York: Academic Press.

Rianto. M. 2000. Pendekatan dan Metode Pembelajaran. Malang: PPPG IPS & PMP Malang.

Santrock, J. W. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.

Slavin, R. E. 2005. Educational Psychology Theorv and Practice. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Wertheimer, M. 1945. Productive Thinking. New York: Harper.

Wheeler, R. 1940. The Science of Psychology. New York: Crowell.

Wolters, C. A, Pintrich, P. R, dan Karabenick, S. A. 2003. Assesing Academic Self-Regulated Learning. Conference on Indicators of Positive Development, Child Trends.

Wolters, C. A. 2003. Regulating of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Phychologist, 38(4): 189-205.

Wilis, R. D. 1989. Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Winne, P. H. 1990. Experimenting to Bootstrap Self Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3): 397-410.

Zimmerman, B. J. 1989. Academic Studying and the Development of Personal Skill: A Self Regulated Perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, (80): 282-290.

______________. 1990. Social Cognitive View of Self Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, (81): 329-339.

______________. 2002. Becoming A Self Regulater Learner: An Overview Theory into Practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4): 811-817.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

How to Cite

Fauziyah, Sri Ani, & Rifqi. (2025). Analysis of the Fundamental Concepts of Educational Psychology from the Perspective of Behaviorism, Cognitivism, and Constructivism Learning Theories. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Keguruan Islam, 1(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i3.14

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.