The Effective and Appropriate Teaching Methods of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic (Calistung) for Grade 1–3 Students in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i3.21Keywords:
Calistung, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, literasi, numerasi, metode pembelajaran.Abstract
This study examines the teaching of reading, writing, and arithmetic (Calistung) in the early grades of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) as a fundamental foundation for literacy and numeracy mastery. The objectives of this research are to explain the basic principles of effective Calistung instruction, to describe appropriate teaching methods, and to analyze the roles of teachers and parents in supporting successful learning. The theoretical framework highlights several principles, namely gradual and continuous learning, a concrete-to-abstract approach, student-centered strategies, and the integration of Islamic values. Relevant teaching methods include the phonetic method, syllabic method, play-based learning, contextual learning, and multisensory approaches. The findings emphasize that students in early MI grades are still in the concrete operational stage; thus, the use of tangible media and enjoyable activities proves more effective in enhancing comprehension. Furthermore, parental involvement in providing consistent learning practices at home serves as a crucial factor that reinforces students’ achievements at school. Therefore, effective Calistung learning in MI requires teachers’ creativity in combining various methods and strong collaboration between school and family to support the development of children’s literacy and numeracy skills.
References
Abimanyu, S. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran 3 SKS. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Bandura, A. 1997. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Bruner, J. S. 1977. The Process of Education. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
Corno, L., dan Mandinach, E. 1983. The Role Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, (18): 188-208.
Gagne, R. M., dan Briggs, L. J. 1979. Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Hamalik, O. (2017). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Hidayah, N., dan Triyono. 2005. Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang.
Hidayah, N. 2013a. Cybercounseling Kognitif Behavioral di Malang Raya Jawa Timur. Proceding Seminar Internasional ABKIN, Denpasar Bali, 14 s.d. 16 November.
Hidayat, R. (2019). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: Kencana.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It’s Here to Stay. California: Corwin Press.
Muslich, M. (2008). KTSP Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Piaget, J. (1952). The Child’s Conception of Number. London: Routledge.
Rianto. M. 2000. Pendekatan dan Metode Pembelajaran. Malang: PPPG IPS & PMP Malang.
Santrock, J. W. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.
Slavin, R. E. 2005. Educational Psychology Theorv and Practice. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wilis, R. D. 1989. Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Winne, P. H. 1990. Experimenting to Bootstrap Self Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3): 397-410.
Zimmerman, B. J. 1989. Academic Studying and the Development of Personal Skill: A Self Regulated Perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, (80): 282-290.
______________. 1990. Social Cognitive View of Self Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, (81): 329-339.
______________. 2002. Becoming A Self Regulater Learner: An Overview Theory into Practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4): 811-817.





