Shifting, Not Changing: Adaptive Continuity in Indonesia’s Educational Policy Innovation Toward Quality Learning.

Authors

  • Sumarta IAI Pangeran Dharma Kusuma Segeran Indramayu
  • Sarwo Edy Universitas Pelita Bangsa, Bekasi
  • Rosidin IAI Padhaku Indramayu
  • Dinata Firmansyah Universitas Islam Depok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i2.11

Keywords:

Inovasi Kebijakan, Pendidikan Bermutu, Kontinuitas Kebijakan, Shifting Not Changing, Abdul Muti.

Abstract

This study aims to unpack the paradigm of "new minister, new policy" in the innovation of educational policy in Indonesia and to analyze the "shifting, not changing" approach promoted by the Minister of Primary and Secondary Education, Prof. Abdul Muti, in the pursuit of quality learning. The research design employed is qualitative policy analysis, focusing on a case study of Prof. Muti’s ideas and policies. The main findings indicate that the "shifting, not changing" approach—rooted in the principle of al-muhafazah ‘ala al-qadim al-shalih wa al-akhdzu bi al-jadid al-aslah (preserving the good from the past and adopting the better from the new)—seeks to create adaptive policy continuity while avoiding radical overhauls. The implication of this research is that sustainable educational policy can be achieved through innovative conservation, in which the positive elements of previous policies are maintained while integrating updates relevant to 21st-century needs. This has the potential to reduce resistance to change and build stability within the educational system. The originality of this study lies in its in-depth analysis of the philosophy and practical implementation of the "shifting, not changing" approach as a solution to the unproductive cycle of policy change, offering an alternative framework for educational innovation in Indonesia.

References

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2017). Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. Harvard Business Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Sage Publications.

Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (2019). Laporan Kinerja Tahunan.

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and beyond. Corwin Press.

Gadjah Mada University Press. Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press. Kurniawan, A., & Sari, N. (2020). Dampak Perubahan Kebijakan Pendidikan Terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional, 5(2), 112-125.

Lubis, A., & Siregar, R. (2018). Efisiensi Anggaran Pendidikan Pasca Pergantian Kebijakan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(1), 45-58.

Muti, A. (2024). Dialog Kebijakan Pendidikan: Shifting, Not Changing. (Pidato/Presentasi tidak diterbitkan).

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.

______. (2021). The Future of Education and Skills 2030: Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing.

______. (2023). Innovation in Education: Indicators and Analysis. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage Publications.

Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan. (2021). Laporan Evaluasi Kurikulum Nasional.

Rahayu, S., & Supriyono, B. (2020). Inovasi Pendidikan di Era Disrupsi: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 1-15.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. Santoso, A., & Hidayat, R. (2019). Dinamika Politik dan Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(3), 201-215.

Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., Roth, G., & Smith, B. S. (2000). The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. Doubleday.

Setiawan, D. (2018). Dinamika Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia: Kajian Historis. Jurnal Sejarah dan Kebudayaan, 13(1), 1-15.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta. UNESCO. (2025). Futures of Education: Learning to Become. (Proyeksi).

Widodo, E., & Susilo, T. (2017). Motivasi Guru dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Kurikulum. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 123-135.

World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

Sumarta, Sarwo Edy, Rosidin, & Dinata Firmansyah. (2025). Shifting, Not Changing: Adaptive Continuity in Indonesia’s Educational Policy Innovation Toward Quality Learning. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Keguruan Islam, 1(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v1i2.11

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.