Teachers’ Learning And Performance Goal Orientations In Responding To Curriculum Change And Their Implications For Performance Appraisal

Authors

  • Selamet Selamet Universitas Darul Ma’arif, Indramayu, Indonesia
  • Kambali Universitas Wiralodra Indramayu, Indonesia
  • Muji Zain Naufal Universitas Darul Ma’arif, Indramayu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v2i3.77

Keywords:

Orientasi belajar guru, orientasi kinerja guru, perubahan kurikulum, penilaian kinerja guru

Abstract

Curriculum change requires teachers to continually develop their competencies, adapt instructional practices, and respond to performance appraisal demands. In this context, learning and performance goal orientations provide important perspectives for understanding how teachers interpret educational change and professional evaluation. This article examines the conceptual relationship between these orientations, teachers’ responses to curriculum change, and the implications for performance appraisal. The study adopts a narrative-conceptual literature review and applies thematic analysis to a purposively selected body of recent research on goal orientation, teacher agency, curriculum reform, performance appraisal, and organizational support. It is not a systematic review and does not claim exhaustive coverage of the literature. The review suggests that learning orientation is associated with competence development, reflection, and pedagogical adaptation, whereas performance orientation relates to meeting standards and interpreting evaluation demands. However, these orientations are not necessarily opposing; their expression is shaped by trust, instructional leadership, collaborative culture, and policy conditions. Performance appraisal can support professional learning when it emphasizes feedback, reflection, and instructional improvement, but may constrain teacher agency when accountability becomes its dominant function. These findings highlight the importance of aligning teacher performance appraisal with professional development and the contextual demands of curriculum change. The article contributes an integrative conceptual understanding of teacher motivation and provides a basis for further empirical research into how goal orientations shape teachers’ experiences of reform and evaluation.

Curriculum change requires teachers to continually develop their competencies, adapt instructional practices, and respond to performance appraisal demands. In this context, learning and performance goal orientations provide important perspectives for understanding how teachers interpret educational change and professional evaluation. This article examines the conceptual relationship between these orientations, teachers’ responses to curriculum change, and the implications for performance appraisal. The study adopts a narrative-conceptual literature review and applies thematic analysis to a purposively selected body of recent research on goal orientation, teacher agency, curriculum reform, performance appraisal, and organizational support. It is not a systematic review and does not claim exhaustive coverage of the literature. The review suggests that learning orientation is associated with competence development, reflection, and pedagogical adaptation, whereas performance orientation relates to meeting standards and interpreting evaluation demands. However, these orientations are not necessarily opposing; their expression is shaped by trust, instructional leadership, collaborative culture, and policy conditions. Performance appraisal can support professional learning when it emphasizes feedback, reflection, and instructional improvement, but may constrain teacher agency when accountability becomes its dominant function. These findings highlight the importance of aligning teacher performance appraisal with professional development and the contextual demands of curriculum change. The article contributes an integrative conceptual understanding of teacher motivation and provides a basis for further empirical research into how goal orientations shape teachers’ experiences of reform and evaluation.

References

Andersson, G. W., Thoutenhoofd, E., & Berhanu, G. (2026). Mainstream teachers, collegial learning and inclusive education in Sweden. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70135

Anning, A. S. (2026). Sustainable STEM teacher learning: The role of college principals in Ghana. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70202

Arslan, K., Dolapcı, E., Erdoğan, O., Savaş, G., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2026). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and teacher enthusiasm in a centralized education system: The mediation of teacher growth mindset and the moderation of supportive school culture. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70836

Aust, L., Linker, J.-C., Eichholz, L., Schiffer, J., Nührenbörger, M., Selter, C., & Souvignier, E. (2025). Implementing formative assessment into school practice: A matter of structuring the intervention? Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871251350680

Banegas, D. L., San Martin, M. G., Sacchi, F., & Porto, M. (2026). Teachers promoting advocacy through social justice English language education: A collaborative action research study. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.70034

Börü, N., Apaydın, Ç., Eriçok, B., & Demiral, S. (2026). The effect of collectivism on teacher professional learning through shared instructional leadership. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70449

Cong-Lem, N. (2024). Teacher agency for change and development in higher education: A scoping literature review. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231224744

Elhamian, N. (2026). Exploring pre-service teachers’ professional learning process in Iran through a CBAM-based approach. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16081293

Ercek, Ö., & Erdağ, C. (2026). Academic optimism profiles and teachers’ conceptions of assessment in a high-stakes system: A latent profile analysis from Türkiye. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70583

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. (2026). Certified but unprepared: Principals expose the disconnect between leadership education and school realities. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751251413193

Gore, J., Patfield, S., Fray, L., Miller, A., Rosser, B., & Harper, M. (2026). Making teaching more attractive: Promising evidence of impact from Australia. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70151

Grant, L. W., Stronge, J. H., Zhang, J., Zhao, J., & Menon, S. (2026). The enduring tension between the professional growth and accountability purposes of teacher evaluation: A ten-year review. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060895

Heyes, J. M., & Kanakam, P. (2026). Pulling the lever without moving the machine: English teacher education and the limits of sexuality education reform. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70797

Huang, X., Zhang, S., Wang, D., & Wang, C. (2026). Is teacher collaboration enough? The essential role of job crafting in supporting teachers’ basic psychological need satisfaction. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70686

Hung, J.-H. (2026). Teacher professional capital in cross-school professional learning communities of the educational reform context: The integration of navigational capital. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261426070

Jiang, H., & Moghan, S. (2026). Classroom assessment-informed reflection approach for teacher professional learning: A case from Singapore. ECNU Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311261450992

Lans, R. van der, Daas, R., Wal, J. J. in, Wilson, E., Inoue, N., Durksen, T. L., & Cornelissen, F. (2025). Does education policy affect teachers’ learning needs? An international comparison of trends in teachers’ continuing professional learning needs in secondary schools in Australia, England, Japan and the Netherlands. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70090

Lazarides, R., Schiefele, U., Daumiller, M., & Dresel, M. (2024). From teacher motivation to instructional behaviour: A systematic review of the mediating processes. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/u2rxp

Márquez Peñaranda, C. G. (2023). Correspondencia entre prácticas pedagógicas y currículo: Una revisión sistemática. Ciencia Latina. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i4.7503

Mertkan, Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2024). Review of systematic reviews in educational leadership and management: Methods used, topics explored and geographies covered. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241291197

Nadav, N., Benoliel, P., & Schechter, C. (2025). How principals’ systems thinking shapes teacher team effectiveness: Exploring the role of organisational learning mechanisms. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70373

Nasution, I. N., & Indrasari, S. Y. (2024). Twenty years of change: A systematic literature review of Indonesian teachers’ responses to curriculum change. Jurnal Kependidikan. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10633

Noughabi, M. A., Yang, S., Botes, E., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2024). The effect of positive emotion on foreign language teacher engagement and well-being: A cross-cultural comparison. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241250364

Preston, D., Qualter, P., & Woods, K. (2026). A systematic review of facilitators and barriers to school staff development projects using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70075

Su, Y. (2026). Exploring the dynamics of professional development agency among Chinese pre-service English teachers during teaching practicum. International Journal of Chinese Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X261455670

Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanblaere, B. (2020). An integral perspective on teacher evaluation: A review of empirical studies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09321-z

Walshe, N., & Rushton, E. A. C. (2025). Understanding teacher agency in the context of school-based climate change and sustainability education: A case study of the experiences of teachers and school students in England. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70036

Wang, X. Y., Tsang, K. K., Newton, P., & Yan, Y. (2026). The relationship between internal accountability and teacher burnout: A moderated mediation model of emotional labor and school type. Beijing International Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/25902547261444253

Yang, X., & Chang, Y.-C. (2026). Relationship between primary school principals’ distributed leadership and teachers’ professional development: The mediating role of professional learning community and identity. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261450666

Zakai-Mashiach, M. (2026). It gave me a new meaning as a teacher: Reimagining professional identity through school-wide innovation in autism-specific education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70062

Downloads

Published

2026-09-10

How to Cite

Selamet, S., Kambali, & Zain Naufal, M. (2026). Teachers’ Learning And Performance Goal Orientations In Responding To Curriculum Change And Their Implications For Performance Appraisal. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Keguruan Islam, 2(3), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.61166/lpki.v2i3.77

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.